User talk:Oknazevad

New comments, questions and concerns go on the bottom of this page. Please use the "New section" tab above if you have a new topic! If you post here I will respond here; other interested parties may want to follow the conversation, and it's rude to force them to jump back and forth. Similarly, if I post to your talk page, please respond there. Don't bother with talkback templates, I watchlist all pages as needed.

Archives: 2004–2009, 2010, January–June 2011, July–December 2011, January–June 2012, July–December 2012, January–June 2013, July–December 2013, January–June 2014, July–December 2014, January–June 2015, July–December 2015, January–June 2016, July–December 2016, January–June 2017, July–December 2017, January–June 2018, June–December 2018, January–June 2019, July–December 2019, January–June 2020, July–December 2020, January–June 2021, July–December 2021, January–June 2022, July–December 2022, January–June 2023, July–December 2023, January–June 2024, July–December 2024

RFC Notice

Hello, this notice is for everyone who took part in the 2023 RfC on lists of airline destinations. I have started a new RfC on the subject. If you would like to participate please follow this link: Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not § RfC on WP:NOT and British Airways destinations. Sunnya343 (talk) 01:14, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Sock?

Changes to Yogi Berra Stadium, Stade Canac, and SIUH Community Park (among others) lead me to suspect User:Jrtrottier of being the same stadium-capacity-obsessed sockpuppet we've seen before. Do you have any thoughts on this? -- Pemilligan (talk) 02:32, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

I had the same suspicion. If you file a WP:SPI let me know. oknazevad (talk) 04:45, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Bbq sauce

You don't one one ingredient which is a common part of the sauce listed under ingredients generally used or in main body as you did not like the source. You also state leadcite however the other ingredients are listed on both the places you have removed Worcester from. Would you like to remove the rest of the ingredients that were both listed in the same places if it's down to leadcite. Also could you please stop swearing in your edited Sharnadd (talk) 14:30, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

Is that English?

No, it's not a common part of the sauce; the ref does not state that, while the sentence does. That means the ref does not support the addition. It's not a valid reliable source. The addition fails WP:V. oknazevad (talk) 15:37, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

So.it.wasnt due to.leadcite like you stated Sharnadd (talk) 16:18, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

Not exclusively. Read the entire edit summary instead of playing "gotcha". In fact, read all the policies, unless you want to be back at ANI again. oknazevad (talk) 16:24, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

Also, perhaps the reason you had to resort the such a poor source that doesn't actually support your claim is because your claim is actually incorrect. Worcestershire sauce is not a widespread common ingredient in barbecue sauce, let alone one common enough to be listed first, and your belief that it is is wrong. This is a pattern of behavior for you. Perhaps in your edits you need to read up on a subject and learn about it instead of assuming you know something and then looking for a justification that doesn't really say what you think it says. oknazevad (talk) 16:29, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

I didn't realise that the Washington post was considered a bad source . It does appear to be in many recipes for BBQ sauce so you would list it as an uncommon ingredient Sharnadd (talk) 10:27, 6 February 2025 (UTC)